[<a href='10738.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='10736.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='10809.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='10732.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 10737 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Tue Nov 30 17:45:20 GMT 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jhenders@xxxxx.xxx <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: From Casters Realm... <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-547750372">On Tue, Nov 30/99, &quot;Kimes, Dean W.&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:Dean_Kimes@...">Dean_Kimes@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; From: &quot;Kimes, Dean W.&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:Dean_Kimes@...">Dean_Kimes@...</a>&gt;<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt;From what I&#39;ve seen, the dev teams idea of extensive testing is to look at<br/>
&gt; the code and say &quot;oh yeah, that should work&quot;.  They can&#39;t even tell when a<br/>
&gt; quest is broken from day one they implement it so they obviously don&#39;t even<br/>
&gt; unit test their code by running it once.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>You can say that again. I&#39;m sure a few of us remember when they first<br/>
released our 30, 38 and 46 songs and they didn&#39;t work except when you<br/>
targetted yourself. Nice QA there guys. Someone couldn&#39;t even find the 2<br/>
minutes needed to test the songs against a bat in the newbie zone.<br/>
<br/>
Dispite Brad&#39;s claims to the contrary I think they are running an<br/>
extremely small crew of programmers and little to no testers (they<br/>
probably make the GM&#39;s responsible for QA as well as their regular jobs<br/>
of phone support for all Verant&#39;s games and their GM duties.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.<br/>
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v<br/>
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*</div>