[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 24157
Date: Thu Mar 1 18:25:28 GMT 2001
Author: Jeffrey Sue
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Re: Whats the arguement?
>Heh, hasn't this thread been Kabong'ed?sure, i agree that this is my opinion. what i am doing is explaining why
>
>In any case, had to chime in here. JS, your point about being
>overpowered and underpowered in different aspects of the game is well
>taken. However, this is the difficulty in determining what "balance"
>really means. The weights you place on the various aspects in
>forming an overall balance picture are no more and no less completely
>arbitrary than anyone elses. Everyone has their favorite aspect they
>want to be good at, and if bards aren't meeting the grade in that
>particular aspect, at that particular time, then people get upset and
>think they're underpowered. It's as simple as that. Stating that
>bards are overpowered "in general" assumes that you have the perfect
>set of weights to apply to each aspect that a bard is either good, or
>not good at to arrive at an overall value. This basically boils down
>to opinion, and your opinion seems to be in the minority amongst most
>bards.
>For each individual player, it comes to finding out what aspects ofwell ok, as to the first part, the data may be relevant but it may not be relevant
>the game bards are good at, and what they are not good at, and
>applying that to their respective playing styles. If they like the
>fit, then they happily keep playing their bards. If they don't, they
>either play a different class, or the complain a lot, and keep
>playing their bard. Given the relatively small number of bards, and
>the number of bards stop playing at a given level. Apparently many
>bards do not find a good fit. I'm not saying this to imply a
>definite conclusion, but the data is relevant. Personally, I enjoy
>playing my bard very much, but do get frustrated in many situations.
>Especially in my current regular adventuring group, which has
>warrior, cleric, enchanter, shaman, me, druid. It is VERY difficult
>for me to justify my participation in the group. Especially in
>places like Howling Stones, where the group would do MUCH better
>replacing me with a rogue. But these are my friends, and they enjoy
>my company, and I theirs. So I play mana song, and self buffs, and
>hope I never have to use my CC, because that means that we're all
>likely going to die. I'm not 53 yet, but in a few weeks when I am, I
>suspect I'll feel a little more useful again.
>In any case, my point is, that the quantification of the power of awell, my personal relative weights are more weight to grouping over soloing and much
>class is very difficult. And I feel it is quite bold of you to state
>that we are overpowered. Unfortunately for us, Verant seems to put
>the weights in the same places you do. :)