PNaCl C/C++ Language Support
Source language support
The currently supported languages are C and C++. The PNaCl toolchain is based on recent Clang, which fully supports C++11 and most of C11. A detailed status of the language support is available here.
For information on using languages other than C/C++, see the FAQ section on other languages.
As for the standard libraries, the PNaCl toolchain is currently based on
libc++
, and the newlib
standard C library. libstdc++
is also
supported but its use is discouraged; see C++ standard libraries
for more details.
Versions
Version information can be obtained:
- Clang/LLVM: run
pnacl-clang -v
. newlib
: use the_NEWLIB_VERSION
macro.libc++
: use the_LIBCPP_VERSION
macro.libstdc++
: use the_GLIBCXX_VERSION
macro.
Preprocessor definitions
When compiling C/C++ code, the PNaCl toolchain defines the __pnacl__
macro. In addition, __native_client__
is defined for compatibility
with other NaCl toolchains.
Memory Model and Atomics
Memory Model for Concurrent Operations
The memory model offered by PNaCl relies on the same coding guidelines as the C11/C++11 one: concurrent accesses must always occur through atomic primitives (offered by atomic intrinsics), and these accesses must always occur with the same size for the same memory location. Visibility of stores is provided on a happens-before basis that relates memory locations to each other as the C11/C++11 standards do.
Non-atomic memory accesses may be reordered, separated, elided or fused according to C and C++’s memory model before the pexe is created as well as after its creation. Accessing atomic memory location through non-atomic primitives is Undefined Behavior <undefined_behavior>.
As in C11/C++11 some atomic accesses may be implemented with locks on
certain platforms. The ATOMIC_*_LOCK_FREE
macros will always be
1
, signifying that all types are sometimes lock-free. The
is_lock_free
methods and atomic_is_lock_free
will return the
current platform’s implementation at translation time. These macros,
methods and functions are in the C11 header <stdatomic.h>
and the
C++11 header <atomic>
.
The PNaCl toolchain supports concurrent memory accesses through legacy
GCC-style __sync_*
builtins, as well as through C11/C++11 atomic
primitives and the underlying GCCMM __atomic_*
primitives. volatile
memory accesses can also be used, though these
are discouraged. See Volatile Memory Accesses.
PNaCl supports concurrency and parallelism with some restrictions:
- Threading is explicitly supported and has no restrictions over what prevalent implementations offer. See Threading.
volatile
and atomic operations are address-free (operations on the same memory location via two different addresses work atomically), as intended by the C11/C++11 standards. This is critical in supporting synchronous “external modifications” such as mapping underlying memory at multiple locations.- Inter-process communication through shared memory is currently not supported. See Future Directions.
- Signal handling isn’t supported, PNaCl therefore promotes all primitives to cross-thread (instead of single-thread). This may change at a later date. Note that using atomic operations which aren’t lock-free may lead to deadlocks when handling asynchronous signals. See Future Directions.
- Direct interaction with device memory isn’t supported, and there is no intent to support it. The embedding sandbox’s runtime can offer APIs to indirectly access devices.
Setting up the above mechanisms requires assistance from the embedding sandbox’s runtime (e.g. NaCl’s Pepper APIs), but using them once setup can be done through regular C/C++ code.
Atomic Memory Ordering Constraints
Atomics follow the same ordering constraints as in regular C11/C++11, but all accesses are promoted to sequential consistency (the strongest memory ordering) at pexe creation time. We plan to support more of the C11/C++11 memory orderings in the future.
Some additional restrictions, following the C11/C++11 standards:
- Atomic accesses must at least be naturally aligned.
- Some accesses may not actually be atomic on certain platforms, requiring an implementation that uses global locks.
- An atomic memory location must always be accessed with atomic primitives, and these primitives must always be of the same bit size for that location.
- Not all memory orderings are valid for all atomic operations.
Volatile Memory Accesses
The C11/C++11 standards mandate that volatile
accesses execute in
program order (but are not fences, so other memory operations can
reorder around them), are not necessarily atomic, and can’t be
elided. They can be separated into smaller width accesses.
Before any optimizations occur, the PNaCl toolchain transforms
volatile
loads and stores into sequentially consistent volatile
atomic loads and stores, and applies regular compiler optimizations
along the above guidelines. This orders volatiles
according to the
atomic rules, and means that fences (including __sync_synchronize
)
act in a better-defined manner. Regular memory accesses still do not
have ordering guarantees with volatile
and atomic accesses, though
the internal representation of __sync_synchronize
attempts to
prevent reordering of memory accesses to objects which may escape.
Relaxed ordering could be used instead, but for the first release it is more conservative to apply sequential consistency. Future releases may change what happens at compile-time, but already-released pexes will continue using sequential consistency.
The PNaCl toolchain also requires that volatile
accesses be at least
naturally aligned, and tries to guarantee this alignment.
The above guarantees ease the support of legacy (i.e. non-C11/C++11) code, and combined with builtin fences these programs can do meaningful cross-thread communication without changing code. They also better reflect the original code’s intent and guarantee better portability.
Threading
Threading is explicitly supported through C11/C++11’s threading libraries as well as POSIX threads.
Communication between threads should use atomic primitives as described in Memory Model and Atomics.
setjmp
and longjmp
PNaCl and NaCl support setjmp
and longjmp
without any
restrictions beyond C’s.
C++ Exception Handling
PNaCl currently supports C++ exception handling through setjmp()
and
longjmp()
, which can be enabled with the --pnacl-exceptions=sjlj
linker flag. Exceptions are disabled by default so that faster and
smaller code is generated, and throw
statements are replaced with
calls to abort()
. The usual -fno-exceptions
flag is also
supported. PNaCl will support full zero-cost exception handling in the
future.
NaCl supports full zero-cost C++ exception handling.
Inline Assembly
Inline assembly isn’t supported by PNaCl because it isn’t portable. The
one current exception is the common compiler barrier idiom
asm("":::"memory")
, which gets transformed to a sequentially
consistent memory barrier (equivalent to __sync_synchronize()
). In
PNaCl this barrier is only guaranteed to order volatile
and atomic
memory accesses, though in practice the implementation attempts to also
prevent reordering of memory accesses to objects which may escape.
NaCl supports a fairly wide subset of inline assembly through GCC’s inline assembly syntax, with the restriction that the sandboxing model for the target architecture has to be respected.
Undefined Behavior
The C and C++ languages expose some undefined behavior which is discussed in PNaCl Undefined Behavior <undefined_behavior>.
Floating-Point
PNaCl exposes 32-bit and 64-bit floating point operations which are mostly IEEE-754 compliant. There are a few caveats:
- Some floating-point behavior is currently left as undefined.
- The default rounding mode is round-to-nearest and other rounding modes
are currently not usable, which isn’t IEEE-754 compliant. PNaCl could
support switching modes (the 4 modes exposed by C99
FLT_ROUNDS
macros). - Signaling
NaN
never fault. Fast-math optimizations are currently supported before pexe creation time. A pexe loses all fast-math information when it is created. Fast-math translation could be enabled at a later date, potentially at a perf-function granularity. This wouldn’t affect already-existing pexe; it would be an opt-in feature.
- Fused-multiply-add have higher precision and often execute faster; PNaCl currently disallows them in the pexe because they aren’t supported on all platforms and can’t realistically be emulated. PNaCl could (but currently doesn’t) only generate them in the backend if fast-math were specified and the hardware supports the operation.
- Transcendentals aren’t exposed by PNaCl’s ABI; they are part of the math library that is included in the pexe. PNaCl could, but currently doesn’t, use hardware support if fast-math were provided in the pexe.
Computed goto
PNaCl supports computed goto
, a non-standard GCC extension to C used
by some interpreters, by lowering them to switch
statements. The
resulting use of switch
might not be as fast as the original
indirect branches. If you are compiling a program that has a
compile-time option for using computed goto
, it’s possible that the
program will run faster with the option turned off (e.g., if the program
does extra work to take advantage of computed goto
).
NaCl supports computed goto
without any transformation.
Future Directions
SIMD
PNaCl currently doesn’t support SIMD. We plan to add SIMD support in the very near future.
NaCl supports SIMD.
Inter-Process Communication
Inter-process communication through shared memory is currently not
supported by PNaCl/NaCl. When implemented, it may be limited to
operations which are lock-free on the current platform (is_lock_free
methods). It will rely on the address-free properly discussed in Memory
Model for Concurrent Operations.
POSIX-style Signal Handling
POSIX-style signal handling really consists of two different features:
Hardware exception handling (synchronous signals): The ability to catch hardware exceptions (such as memory access faults and division by zero) using a signal handler.
PNaCl currently doesn’t support hardware exception handling.
NaCl supports hardware exception handling via the
<nacl/nacl_exception.h>
interface.Asynchronous interruption of threads (asynchronous signals): The ability to asynchronously interrupt the execution of a thread, forcing the thread to run a signal handler.
A similar feature is thread suspension: The ability to asynchronously suspend and resume a thread and inspect or modify its execution state (such as register state).
Neither PNaCl nor NaCl currently support asynchronous interruption or suspension of threads.
If PNaCl were to support either of these, the interaction of
volatile
and atomics with same-thread signal handling would need
to be carefully detailed.